Is Vaping Health Risky?
The writer examines the possible social and health benefits of adolescent smoking, while also considering potential harm. She refers to e-cigarettes as electric cigarettes but calls them a tobacco product. The authors explore the various possibilities for teens in light of the fact that smoking has become a socially unacceptable behavior. She argues that people should think about the social norms that promote smoking to teens, while also considering the dangers of nicotine addiction. The author also examines the difference between teenage smoking and adult smoking. After reviewing the literature, I trust her that e-cigarette vaporizers are a harmless option to smoking, if used correctly.
The majority of the data on smoking and its risks comes from adults, which helps it be hard to assess the way the risks are reduced by e-smoking. It’s estimated that approximately fourteen thousand deaths each year are due to smoking. This figure is likely an underestimation, since many deaths may be the result of second hand smoke. In addition, it assumes that people who smoke don’t plan to do so.
The author suggests that we should think about the fact that e-cigarettes mimic the result of tobacco products, while providing a much less harmful experience. The problem with this particular approach is that it treats all smoking as dangerous, even though it isn’t. Many people don’t realize how similar the taste of a cigarette to a vaporizer, or how similar the physical act of smoking is to smoking. Furthermore, it presumes that folks who use the cigarettes aren’t taking any real risks. The argument that originates from this is that because e smokers don’t feel the physical effects of smoking, they can’t be deemed to be causing these deaths, when they are.
However, it’s important to remember that smoking cigarettes and using vaporizers are both virtually identical behaviors. What makes vaporizing unique is that it allows a smoker to get the same effect as smoking, without the associated risks. Vaporizing offers a highly similar experience as smoking cigarettes. This means that vapers may be increasing their chances of quitting the habit. In addition, it means that they’re taking steps in the direction of protecting their health while simultaneously increasing the opportunity of enjoying a wholesome lifestyle.
The writer makes some valid points concerning the dangers of smoking. He also makes some valid criticisms of having less nicotine, and of the dangers of carbon monoxide smoke. vapinger.com However, his real issue is among regulation. He argues that e-cigarette companies must not be permitted to advertise their products as safe when all they have done is increase the quantity of chemicals and additives which are present in traditional cigarettes. The problem with this argument is that people have already seen the negative effects of increased levels of these chemicals in traditional cigarettes.
We curently have countless reports concerning the negative side effects of nicotine, especially in smokers trying to quit. We already have a lot of stories about the rise of cancers and respiratory problems due to long-term nicotine use. It’s true that e-cigs don’t contain any nicotine, but that hasn’t stopped them from being advertised as a cure-all for smoking. E Cigarettes have certainly been a significant factor in the spike in smoking-related deaths in the last few years.
The author does not appear to recognize the irony of arguing against smoking by way of a healthier alternative, but doesn’t seem to think about the potential negative health effects of his product either. He also discounts the idea that smokers who switch to the cigarettes will eventually turn back to cigarette smoking. He seems to think that all we need to do to beat cigarettes would be to reduce the amount of nicotine we take in. The fact is that smokers who try to quit often do so due to other health issues, and aren’t just embracing the cigarettes to get away from their bad habits. There are many reasons why people smoke. The author has basically ignored every one of them in his arguments against vaping.
While it holds true that the cigarettes usually do not contain any real tobacco, a number of the chemicals found in using tobacco are found in the smokes. The writer seems to be of the belief that all we must do to solve the issue of smoking is to decrease the amount of chemicals we take in through our lungs. The argument he presents is merely not based in sound scientific fact. There is absolutely no real proof that reducing the volume of chemicals we ingest improves anything other than our health. The author also discounts the idea that the cigarettes are less dangerous than regular cigarettes because they don’t contain the harmful chemicals within regular cigarettes.